More realistically, however, we would expect there to be non-conservative forces acting on the trike, such as rolling resistance and aerodynamic drag. When these forces act upon the trike a simple analytical solution becomes less easy to obtain, at least if the angle of descent is allowed to not remain constant. To parametize the problem we will use an independent variable s that will be distance, in metres, from the summit of the hill or mountain. We will assume this mountain has a road that we are travelling down and s is the distance from the summit along this road.
We will first assume that the variation in gravitational acceleration between the base and summit of the hill or mountain is negligible and derive the equation of motion based on this assumption.
The first step in deriving the equation of motion is to determine the Lagrangian of the system. The Lagrangian contains both the kinetic and potential energy of the system and hence both will be calculated next.
The potential energy term will only include the conservative force of gravitation. To compute it, we need to be able to formulate the height of the trike above sea level in terms of s. If we have inclination/declination angle data for the hill in question, let us define θ(s) as the declination angle (positive when downhill) at s metres from the summit. If we form an infinitesimal triangle on the hill/mountain, we will see that dh=−dssinθ and hence: dsdh=−sinθ(s). Integrating from the summit, we obtain that: h(s)=hsummit−∫0ssinθ(σ)dσ. Where hsummit is the height of the hill/mountain, or rather its tallest point accessible by road, and we use σ as a dummy (integration) variable for distance from the summit.
Hence if gravitational acceleration can be assumed to be constant: V=mg(hsummit−∫0ssinθ(σ)dσ).
It is important to note, however, that nonconservative forces — such as air resistance and rolling resistance — are a major factor in determining the speed of a tricycle going downhill. To account for these effects, we need to calculate generalized forces. Fortunately, since our problem only has a single independent variable — that of distance from the summit — calculating the generalized forces should be straightforward.
Rolling resistance is proportional to the normal force. The normal force could be calculated as: N=mgcosθ(s). The rolling resistance force is defined as:
Fr=CrrN.
Where Crr is the coefficient of rolling resistance. Substituting Equation (8) into Equation (8) yields: Fr=mgCrrcosθ(s). This force directly opposes motion in the direction of s.
As for air resistance (or drag): FD=2ρCDAv2. Substituting Equation (1) into Equation (10) yields: FD=2ρCDAs˙2. Where ρ is air density in kg⋅m−3, CD is a dimensionless drag coefficient, A is the cross sectional surface area (in m2) that the area acts on. This is also in the opposite direction to motion. Hence the generalized non-conservative forces acting on our tricycle would be:
The Euler-Lagrange equation with dissipative forces in the s coordinate is: dtd∂s˙∂L−∂s∂L=Qs. The left-hand side of Equation (12) can also be denoted as δsδS, the functional derivative of S with respect to s. S is the action and is defined by:
S=∫t0tfL(s,s˙,t)dt
where t0 is the starting time and tf is the finishing time. First, we shall calculate ∂s˙∂L, the canonical momentum:
∂s˙∂L=ms˙.
Hence: dtd∂s˙∂L=ms¨. As for the second term in Equation (12), it is:
Since the trike starts at zero velocity u(0)=0. Hence we have: emρCDAsu(s)=2g∫0semρCDAσ(sinθ(σ)−Crrcosθ(σ))dσ. Multiplying by e−mρCDAs yields: u(s)=2ge−mρCDAs∫0semρCDAσ(sinθ(σ)−Crrcosθ(σ))dσ.
Square rooting we obtain the velocity: v(s)=2ge−mρCDAs∫0semρCDAσ(sinθ(σ)−Crrcosθ(σ))dσ. We neglected the negative possibility because velocity is positive in the downhill direction, which is the only direction the trike will go when under the action of gravity.
Below are the velocities achieved in the above model for various CDA and Crr values when descending Castle Hill. The simulation did not end at 0 metres above sea level; it ended at about 36 metres above sea level, which is approximately at the high end of Gregory Street. θ(s) values were calculated from QldDem data on elevation.
Velocity while descending Castle Hill, assuming constant gravity.
Gravitational acceleration depends on the distance from the centre of the source of gravity, so there is some variation in gravitational acceleration between the base and summit of hills and mountains although it is minor. In this section, the equation of motion will be derived while accounting for this variability.
If we cannot assume constant gravity, then: V=(rbase+h(s))GMm−rsummitGMm. Factorizing: V=GMm((rbase+h(s))−1−rsummit−1). Where G is the gravitational constant and M is the mass of the Earth.
Substituting Equation (4) into Equation (20) yields:
The conservative force term of the Euler-Lagrange equation is therefore: ∂s∂L=(rsummit−∫0ssinθ(σ)dσ)2GMmsinθ(s). Hence the functional derivative of S with respect to s is therefore:
δsδS=ms¨−(rsummit−∫0ssinθ(σ)dσ)2GMmsinθ(s).
The time derivative of generalized momentum is the same as above. As for Qs it is: Qs=−(rsummit−∫0ssinθ(σ)dσ)2GMmCrrcosθ(s)−2ρCDAs˙2. Substituting Equations (22) and (23) into Equation (12) yields:
Therefore Equation (25) becomes: dsd[emρCDAsu(s)]=2GMemρCDAs(rsummit−∫0ssinθ(σ)dσ)2sinθ(s)−Crrcosθ(s). Integrating both sides of Equation (26) from 0 to s with respect to s (calling it a new dummy variable σ; σ in our denominator will be renamed ξ) yields: emρCDAsu(s)−e0u(0)=2GM∫0semρCDAσ(rsummit−∫0σsinθ(ξ)dξ)2sinθ(σ)−Crrcosθ(σ)dσ. The trike's initial velocity is assumed to be zero, hence u(0)=0:
Square rooting u to obtain velocity yields: v(s)=2GMe−mρCDAs∫0semρCDAσ(rsummit−∫0σsinθ(ξ)dξ)2sinθ(σ)−Crrcosθ(σ)dσ. Below are the velocities achieved in the above model for various CDA and Crr values when descending Castle Hill. The simulation did not end at 0 metres above sea level; it ended at about 36 metres above sea level, which is approximately at the high end of Gregory Street.
Velocity while descending Castle Hill, assuming non-constant gravity.